Zuma Towers – efficiency and cost estimated

Introduction

With Zuma Tower now live, players have begun testing its real cost structure across all reward tiers. While the core mechanics are relatively simple, the economic efficiency of the event is far less obvious. This article focuses exclusively on costs, averages, and efficiency, based on repeated testing rather than theoretical probabilities.

The goal here is to answer two practical questions:

How expensive is it to reach the final tier and obtain Mystic Ancient Coins?
How does Zuma Tower compare to previous events—specifically Primal Pinball—for Stardust and Crimson Moonlight acquisition?

To answer this, I have written the guide below to give you a detailed look into the cost analysis of this new event. This would not be possible if not for awesome player GMNikson who has been kind enough to provide us with his data and results from testing Zuma quite extensively. Thank you GMNikson! I recommend everyone to go and watch his testing-video that is available on YouTube here.

Reaching the Final Floor: Mystic Ancient Coins

Testing focused first on breaching Floor 7, which grants Mystic Ancient Coins used for castle skin upgrades. The average cost of 1,500 Zuma Visions to reach Floor 7.

Player GMNikson has been kind enough to share testing results with us all spending:

Across three full attempts to reach the final tier:

Attempt	Zuma Visions Spent
Attempt 1	1575
Attempt 2	1475
Attempt 3	1435

This results in an average cost of 1,495 Zuma Visions to reach Floor 7.

At current pricing, this corresponds to roughly $125USD with only cheap 5$ bundles and around $185 USD using the 15$ bundles per successful run. Let’s call that an average around 150$ (also fitting Gtarcade bundles and the large quantity needed if you are going for multiple skin upgrades) meaning around $75 per single castle skin upgrade, since one completion yields enough coins for two upgrades. This is actually quite cheap compared to what some castle skins have had for price tags in the past.

Variance and Luck Factor

A small number of players reported reaching the final tier for as little as 900 Zuma Visions. These cases should be considered highly fortunate outliers rather than realistic expectations. The observed average remains a more reliable benchmark for planning purposes.

Crimson Moonlight and Stardust Efficiency

Crimson Moonlight was used as the primary test metric, as Stardust shares the same reward pool and scales identically. Results can therefore be applied to both resources. Again this is based on player testing, thanks GMNikson!

Total Test Investment

Total Zuma Visions spent: 3,360
Approximate cost: $300 USD (GT Arcade packs)

Tier-by-Tier Results

Tier	Cost per Claim	Reward per Claim	Average Total Gained
Tier 2	5 Visions	1 Crimson	224 Crimson
Tier 3	35 Visions	4 Crimson	128 Crimson
Tier 4	155 Visions	18 Crimson	130 Crimson
Tier 5	515 Visions	60 Crimson	130 Crimson
Tier 6	995 Visions	120 Crimson	135 Crimson

Key Observation

Despite higher tiers offering larger single-claim rewards, total returns remain remarkably flat across tiers once costs are accounted for. The increased expense of climbing effectively cancels out the larger payouts.

The Most Efficient Strategy: Staying Low

After testing, one conclusion became clear: The most cost-efficient way to obtain non-castle skin rewards is to focus on the lowest guaranteed tier.

Tier 2 rewards are always accessible after spending a single pool of 5 Zuma Visions, with occasional lucky rolls allowing progression to Tier 3. This creates a steady baseline with limited downside risk.

Optimized Outcome

When factoring in natural critical rolls:

Total Crimson gained: 262
Total Zuma Visions spent: 1,120

This approach significantly outperforms deliberate attempts to climb higher tiers in terms of cost efficiency. Note that if you are after Stardust, you may use a Free Exploration if you land on level 2 initially, since there is no downside to dropping to level 1 in terms of Stardust. This is however not recommended for players looking for Crimson.

Comparison: Zuma Tower vs Primal Pinball

To contextualize these numbers, Zuma Tower must be compared against its predecessor, the Primal Pinball event. Under comparable spending levels, Zuma Tower produces roughly one-third of the Crimson Moonlight obtained from Primal Pinball.

This makes Zuma Tower:

~3× more expensive for Crimson Moonlight
Even worse in relative terms for Stardust

Final Assessment

From a pure efficiency standpoint, Zuma Tower represents a significant downgrade compared to Primal Pinball for Stardust and Crimson Moonlight acquisition.

High-tier rewards do not meaningfully improve overall returns.
Floor 7 provides a new premium avenue for castle skin upgrades, but at a steep cost.
The event’s economic design strongly discourages climbing beyond guaranteed tiers.

In exchange for introducing upgradable castle skins, the developers have substantially reduced the volume of core progression resources traditionally associated with these events.

For players focused on Crimson Moonlight or Stardust efficiency, Zuma Tower should be approached conservatively. Its real value lies in premium cosmetic progression, not resource farming.

Published: 13-01-2026

Did You Know?